Babbu Maan Most awaited song of the year MIL GAYI PIND DE MORH TE Promos

Babbu Maan Hero Hitler In Love movie promo 2011 FIRST LOOK(TEASER)Babbu Maan New Song 2011 ....

BHINDRAWALA TERRORIST OR SANT FROM GURDAS MANN& BABBU MAAN 2011 2012

BABBU MAAN LATEST INTERVIEW BY K GILL PART 2

Satinder Sartaj Interview

babu maan vs tarsem singh Interview.mp4

Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee indicated that he was not contemplating any downward revision in the disinvestment target of Rs.40,000 crore set for the current fiscal, as of now. The government's effort would be to achieve it but much would depend on various other factors.
“I am not revising it [disinvestment target] right now. We have fixed the target and we will try to achieve it, but it depends on many other situations, particularly the economic health conditions,” Mr. Mukherjee told the media on the sidelines of a seminar on disinvestment. Till date, the government has been able to mop up a mere Rs.1,145 crore through the sole equity sell-off in the Power Finance Corporation (PFC). Stock markets have remained either very volatile or in a tailspin in the wake of the global economic uncertainties such as the slowdown in the U.S. and the ongoing eurozone sovereign debt crisis.
As a result, all public offerings of public sector undertakings (PSUs) lined up for stake sale in 2011-12 have been kept in abeyance. With more than half the fiscal year over, questions are not being raised in various quarters as to whether the disinvestment target can at all be met. Referring to these concerns, Mr. Mukherjee said: “All these aspects have to be taken into account and the government will take a decision at the appropriate time.” PSUs that were initially lined up for stake sale were SAIL and Hindustan Copper (HCL), ONGC, BHEL, RINL, Hindustan Aeronautics and NBCC, among others.
Earlier, inaugurating the seminar on ‘PSU disinvestment through listing — a tool for improved corporate governance' here, Mr. Mukherjee maintained that the government would retain at least 51 per cent shareholding in PSUs to keep them in the public sector fold while pointing out that a higher stake unnecessarily locked up capital which could otherwise be deployed in social sector development. “Keeping more than 51 per cent equity in government companies locked-up does not make economic sense when such valuable resources are required for redeployment in area where development is needed … Retaining more than 51 per cent government shareholding in a company has no impact on its character as a CPSE [Central public sector enterprise] and it only keeps government investment locked up, often at a value which may be lower than what the market would offer,” he said.
Mr. Mukherjee said there were 50 listed Central PSUs now which accounted for 22.25 per cent share of the total market capitalisation on the Bombay Stock Exchange. “Through the public offerings of CPSE, the government has endeavoured to unlock the true nature of these public sectors and, most important, to provide an opportunity to the people of India to become shareholders in these companies,” he said. Mr. Mukherjee asserted that the true worth of a company could only be gauged on its listing and when its shares were publicly traded, which unlocked the true value of the company.

Already at the receiving end of political backlash after the petrol price revision, the government is not looking at raising prices for now of subsidised diesel, kerosene and cooking LPG despite oil PSUs losing a record Rs 360 crore per day.
A top oil ministry official said it will be "suicidal" to even think of raising prices of diesel, LPG or kerosene just before Parliament is to meet or even during the one-month long session. The winter session of Parliament begins on Tuesday. The Ministry, which had given oil firms a tacit approval for the November 4 hike in petrol price by Rs 1.80 per litre, was taken by surprise by the criticism revision in price of a commodity that was decontrolled or freed from government control generated.
It was even more astonished when the November 16 reduction in petrol price by Rs 2.22 a litre in line with falling global oil rates, was not praised but criticised as a decision taken for political considerations. "Both decisions were dictated by economic considerations - the hike because of fall in rupee and reduction because of dip in international oil prices," the official said but agreed that the political backlash could have been avoided if the oil companies had waited for few more days before raising rates.
 Oil companies pressed for a hike as they were losing Rs 1.52 a litre on petrol (excluding local sales tax) because of weakening rupee. But had they shown little more patience, the loss would have been more than neutralised by the Rs 1.85 per litre gain they made because of fall in global oil rates in next 10 days. "The oil companies passed on to consumers whatever gain they made," the official said.

Money from Punjab state exchequer spent on advertisements issued to a television channel by the Punjab public relations department, was going into the pockets of ruling Badal family, said a document placed on record before the Punjab and Haryana high court.
 The court has asked chief minister Parkash Singh Badal and his son and deputy chief minister Sukhbir Singh Badal to respond to the allegation. Application was placed on record by a division bench comprising Justice M M Kumar and Justice Rajiv Narain Raina. It's all in the family as Sukhbir Badal is the state public relations minister, a portfolio earlier held by his brother-in-law Bikram Singh Majithia.
And, the money was routed to a channel owned by the Badals through an agency owned by Sukhbir's wife and Akali MP from Bathinda, Harsimrat Badal, the document said. However, the exact amount chanelled in this fashion has not been mentioned. Stunning revelations surfaced on Friday in the application filed by barrister Himmat Singh Shergill during the hearing of an ongoing public interest litigation (PIL) filed by him, challenging Punjab's transport policy allegedly manipulated for personal profits by the Badal family.
 In his application, Shergill said, "It is pertinent to bring to the notice of the high court that government of Punjab gives advertisements to PTC channels worth huge amounts of money which is under the aegis of G-Next Media Private Limited, a subsidiary company of Gur-Baz Media Private Ltd, which is further a subsidiary of Orbit Resorts Private Limited." "Orbit Resorts, owned by the Badal family, has around 99% shares in Gur Baz Media, which has 99.97% shares in G-Next Media, under which PTC channels are run. The government advertisements issued to the channels were actually translating into monetary benefit to the companies, in which the Badal family have substantial interest," Shergill stated.
 He submitted to the court that as per documents of the Union ministry of corporate affairs, Harsimrat Badal is the managing director of Orbit Resorts Private Limited and drawing a remuneration of Rs 3.60 crore per annum. "Parkash Singh Badal, Sukhbir Badal, Harsimrat Badal, her brother Bikram Singh Majithia, his father-in-law Satyajit Singh Majithia, his mother-in-law Sukhmanjus Majithia, his sister Praneet Kaur Kairon have been shareholders in Orbit Resorts Private Limited at some time or at all times. They also have stake in Baaz Transporters Private Limited,
 Dabwali Transport and Real Estate Private Limited," the application said. In support of his claims, Shergill annexed documents of these companies owned by Badals. He said these were procured from the Union ministry of corporate affairs with the assistance of a chartered accountant and company secretary. In his application, Shergill has sought an inquiry of the entire issue by CBI or any other agency not under the direct or indirect control of the CM and his son, or from a sitting or a retired high court judge. The case would come up for hearing on December 14.

Reacting to SAD chief Sukhbir Badal's challenge to prove his worth by contesting either from Lambi or Giddarbaha, PPCC president Amarinder Singh said if contesting from others' constituencies was a proof of a politician's worth, then Sukhbir should fight from Patiala. "He will get to know where he stands," Captain told the crowd at 'Punjab Bachao' rally, here.
 Stressing that it was a "childish" challenge, Amarinder said, "The planning of both father-son to run away from their constituencies of Lambi and Jalalabad is even more childish than this. But like Badals, I am not in the habit of running away from my constituency." Promising to "usher in a prosperous and progressive Punjab where no youth would remain unemployed and where no farmer would be distressed to commit suicide", Amarinder asked Sukhbir to spell out the development he was claiming to have done for which he was seeking votes from the state people.
"If vendetta, intimidation and money could win elections, Om Prakash Chautala would never have been defeated as he intimidated people and DMK would not have lost in Tamil Nadu even after spending Rs 4,500 crore". Factionalism between party MLAs came to the fore when Faridkot MLA Avtar Singh Brar asked his followers to raise hands to show their strength in the rally. Avtar Brar was reacting to Kotkapura MLA Ripjit Brar's assertion that the Capt meet his followers, who have come from far-off villages. Avtar Brar said followers of many leaders have come, but senior leaders must remain in discipline. Both Brars and some youth Congress leaders maintained distance throughout the rally.