CHIBRI  :D:

Mundaxrisky is so much more sensible than he tries to pretend not to be  :wait:

Amarjit kaure  jad moi nasha kita hunda wa ta moi da damag ida e chalda wa   :D:

Vya to :D:

la moi ta oh  har wkend karda wa ... guddi bus ammi  jhaka e onda wa koi vadi gal noi :

Dhan Dham baba risky das g .........bharamchari :D:

topic gia taiil lain .. BUT shukar wa moinu kisse ne  sahi recognize  ta kita  ty ty bro  :hugg:  :laugh:

WAHGURU TO  TE MOI DE GUSSE TO :D:

But in general  moi fear NONEE ...cz 9th Guru Ji ne kiha wa : BAYEH  KISSE KO DETT NAH.. NAH BEYEH MANAT ANN  :rabb:

  The war on terror, that campaign without end launched 14 years ago by George Bush, is tying itself up in ever more grotesque contortions. On Monday the trial in London of a Swedish man, Bherlin Gildo, accused of terrorism in Syria, collapsed after it became clear British intelligence had been arming the same rebel groups the defendant was charged with supporting.

The prosecution abandoned the case, apparently to avoid embarrassing the intelligence services. The defence argued that going ahead with the trial would have been an “affront to justice” when there was plenty of evidence the British state was itself providing “extensive support” to the armed Syrian opposition.

 Terrorism has come about in assimilationist France and also in multicultural Britain. Why is that?
Kenan Malik
 Read more
That didn’t only include the “non-lethal assistance” boasted of by the government (including body armour and military vehicles), but training, logistical support and the secret supply of “arms on a massive scale”. Reports were cited that MI6 had cooperated with the CIA on a “rat line” of arms transfers from Libyan stockpiles to the Syrian rebels in 2012 after the fall of the Gaddafi regime.

Clearly, the absurdity of sending someone to prison for doing what ministers and their security officials were up to themselves became too much. But it’s only the latest of a string of such cases. Less fortunate was a London cab driver Anis Sardar, who was given a life sentence a fortnight earlier for taking part in 2007 in resistance to the occupation of Iraq by US and British forces. Armed opposition to illegal invasion and occupation clearly doesn’t constitute terrorism or murder on most definitions, including the Geneva convention.

But terrorism is now squarely in the eye of the beholder. And nowhere is that more so than in the Middle East, where today’s terrorists are tomorrow’s fighters against tyranny – and allies are enemies – often at the bewildering whim of a western policymaker’s conference call.

For the past year, US, British and other western forces have been back in Iraq, supposedly in the cause of destroying the hyper-sectarian terror group Islamic State (formerly known as al-Qaida in Iraq). This was after Isis overran huge chunks of Iraqi and Syrian territory and proclaimed a self-styled Islamic caliphate.

The campaign isn’t going well. Last month, Isis rolled into the Iraqi city of Ramadi, while on the other side of the now nonexistent border its forces conquered the Syrian town of Palmyra. Al-Qaida’s official franchise, the Nusra Front, has also been making gains in Syria.

Some Iraqis complain that the US sat on its hands while all this was going on. The Americans insist they are trying to avoid civilian casualties, and claim significant successes. Privately, officials say they don’t want to be seen hammering Sunni strongholds in a sectarian war and risk upsetting their Sunni allies in the Gulf.

Live Paris attacks: fate of 'mastermind' unknown after deadly raid – live
Seven arrested and two dead including woman who detonated suicide vest after police operation north of Paris

 Read more
A revealing light on how we got here has now been shone by a recently declassified secret US intelligence report, written in August 2012, which uncannily predicts – and effectively welcomes – the prospect of a “Salafist principality” in eastern Syria and an al-Qaida-controlled Islamic state in Syria and Iraq. In stark contrast to western claims at the time, the Defense Intelligence Agency document identifies al-Qaida in Iraq (which became Isis) and fellow Salafists as the “major forces driving the insurgency in Syria” – and states that “western countries, the Gulf states and Turkey” were supporting the opposition’s efforts to take control of eastern Syria.

Raising the “possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality”, the Pentagon report goes on, “this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran)”.

American forces bomb one set of rebels while backing another in Syria
Which is pretty well exactly what happened two years later. The report isn’t a policy document. It’s heavily redacted and there are ambiguities in the language. But the implications are clear enough. A year into the Syrian rebellion, the US and its allies weren’t only supporting and arming an opposition they knew to be dominated by extreme sectarian groups; they were prepared to countenance the creation of some sort of “Islamic state” – despite the “grave danger” to Iraq’s unity – as a Sunni buffer to weaken Syria.

That doesn’t mean the US created Isis, of course, though some of its Gulf allies certainly played a role in it – as the US vice-president, Joe Biden, acknowledged last year. But there was no al-Qaida in Iraq until the US and Britain invaded. And the US has certainly exploited the existence of Isis against other forces in the region as part of a wider drive to maintain western control.

The calculus changed when Isis started beheading westerners and posting atrocities online, and the Gulf states are now backing other groups in the Syrian war, such as the Nusra Front. But this US and western habit of playing with jihadi groups, which then come back to bite them, goes back at least to the 1980s war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, which fostered the original al-Qaida under CIA tutelage.

It was recalibrated during the occupation of Iraq, when US forces led by General Petraeus sponsored an El Salvador-style dirty war of sectarian death squads to weaken the Iraqi resistance. And it was reprised in 2011 in the Nato-orchestrated war in Libya, where Isis last week took control of Gaddafi’s home town of Sirte.

In reality, US and western policy in the conflagration that is now the Middle East is in the classic mould of imperial divide-and-rule. American forces bomb one set of rebels while backing another in Syria, and mount what are effectively joint military operations with Iran against Isis in Iraq while supporting Saudi Arabia’s military campaign against Iranian-backed Houthi forces in Yemen. However confused US policy may often be, a weak, partitioned Iraq and Syria fit such an approach perfectly.

What’s clear is that Isis and its monstrosities won’t be defeated by the same powers that brought it to Iraq and Syria in the first place, or whose open and covert war-making has fostered it in the years since. Endless western military interventions in the Middle East have brought only destruction and division. It’s the people of the region who can cure this disease – not those who incubated the virus.

Gosh moi  kujj hoor add karna ta mangda wa   aa topic te  but dunoo wuttt .. cz  moi still doin da same thangzz wut moi used to 6 yrs ago :beer:

PROLLY  cz of DOWRY  n  their FAKE BOGUS PRIDE n HONOR  :wait:   moi aint  a expert  on dis issue so moi gonna limit  views. Perhaps parents  think  ke vaddi ho ke kitte ahh sadde  kandan nu taint  na kar davve... out of caste love marriage  na karva lavve... or shez gonna become  some predator's victim .. or some other baseless n senseless  excuses like dis.... Munda chaahe jina marzi risky varga chawal nikamma hobbe,nashede hobbe ona  de kandaan nu  koi taint  noi lagda but je koi kuri  avde love , fer her happiness laye kisse  apne pasand de in/out caste naal  viah karva lindi wa  without her parents consent  ta oss nu kehnde wa ... ke nee tu jamdi kyo noi mar gaye ( so moi heard)

But in west  moi think punjabi's do av dif mentality   boud  their fetuses gender .. there gonna be alwayz  few stone age  durt bags who tend to abort der female fetuses  but .. moi think   situation is nawt dat serious in da USA atleast.


 In ancient  times  kuris nu paida hunde he maar  dita janda se ... fer wut eva reason fir Guru Nanak Dev ji ne hindustan nu  ah masg dita ke .. SO KYON MANDA  AKHIYAN ..JIT JAMME RAJAAN

In ancient  times ... der was dis ritual called SATI .. whr   women were forced to die with  der DEAD HUBBIES on  same fire. fir GURU NANAK DEV JI  ne msg dita ( moinu ahh wakk   changi tarah noi onda so  pls 4give moi) " SATIAN  EH NA AKHIAN  JO SOOLI CHAD MARAN ...SATIYAN SAHEE NANKA JO BIRHE CHOOT MARAN " .. mean ke satiya oh noi hundian  jo apne pati de naal maar ditia jandia wa .. satiya oh hundia ne  jo pati de marn de viyoog vich  khud mar jandia wa ..... so guyz kuj galt lik ta hobbe ta sowwie  like moi  av said   moi aint a expert  in dis issue .. jina  GW skool vicho moi sikia wa o das ta ...TY :slt:

HANDICAP chix r  also welcome ...bus nabaz chaldi hobbe :photo: :D:

Ya goo moi french niggazzz... go n :bomb:  BBQ em  duurty islamic  faggits ...  send em to der so imaginary  ZANNAT  whr they gonna  rewarded wid 20 virgins ( ..as per der belief lol ) .. MAY LORD BE WITH YA  :rabb: