This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - SonnenKinder
4301
« on: January 24, 2010, 05:12:07 PM »
hw do u knw.. i am jawan.. :he: :huhh: nwty boy
matrimonial col vich tere vya di ad dekhi c
4302
« on: January 24, 2010, 05:03:37 PM »
:love: :love: :love: mera husband b eho jehe kamm kareya karuga... 8-> 8-> 8->
If u wanna marry an astronaut, change your nick. Astronauts dun like Gurr
4303
« on: January 24, 2010, 10:38:28 AM »
4304
« on: January 24, 2010, 09:35:05 AM »
Earlier today, NASA Flight Engineer TJ Creamer sent the first live tweet from outer space, urging earth-bound Twitter users to correspond with the NASA team on the International Space Station. "Hello Twitterverse!" Creamer said in the message. "We r now LIVE tweeting from the International Space Station -- the 1st live tweet from Space! :) More soon, send your ?s." TJ Creamer Technically, Creamer isn't the first astronaut to tap into Twitter. Last year, a crew member on the Atlantis shuttle sent messages to NASA Mission Control, which uploaded the short blasts. And in 2008, NASA created a page for the Mars Phoenix Lander. But Creamer is the first to take advantage of a wireless connection on the International Space Station to send a tweet directly from space.
In coming weeks, Creamer will post additional tweets, as will two of his crewmates, ISS Commander Jeff Williams and Japanese astronaut Soichi Noguchi.
4305
« on: January 24, 2010, 09:17:53 AM »
Hii Bro, A very Happy B'day. I wish All ur Dreams come true and May God bless you with the precious of stones (health, wisdom n happiness from His Treasure :happy:
4306
« on: January 24, 2010, 07:10:39 AM »
4307
« on: January 24, 2010, 06:29:21 AM »
ja fer sadean huhhh :huhh:
lol @ sadea
4308
« on: January 24, 2010, 06:26:30 AM »
aja hor sohni ban dea :he: :he: :he: :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:
na pher maria akha da nishna b ghaint ban jau :happy:
4309
« on: January 24, 2010, 06:23:14 AM »
:hehe: :hehe: :hehe: :hehe: meaowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww :pagel: :pagel: :pagel: :pagel: :pagel:
u shud rather howl :lost:
4310
« on: January 24, 2010, 06:20:18 AM »
hahahhahah :hehe: :hehe: :hehe: :hehe: :hehe: koi nah kudi nu samjha de fer :pagel: :pagel: :pagel:
bibi tu smja da mara honda
4311
« on: January 24, 2010, 06:16:11 AM »
nah jo ah jalim kam kita
enu dekh ka tu apna nick jalim kaur rakia c :wait:
4312
« on: January 24, 2010, 06:14:16 AM »
dekh aunty kali te 11 bande piche lai firdi aa
fer ohdi okie report hoi ki nahi :hehe: :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:
samjhea :pagel:
beshrm hagi
4313
« on: January 24, 2010, 04:37:01 AM »
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
fir tan baahli vadiya gall aa
punjabis :balle: :balle: :balle: :balle:
4314
« on: January 24, 2010, 04:29:25 AM »
Its a lengthy topic but lemme explain the way i think one can understand it more clearly and easily. I begin with a basic concept. Imagine, you are on a train thats moving forward at a speed of 50KM/hour. U throw a ball in the direction, that the train is moving. Relative to you and the train the ball leaves your hand travelling at 20KM/hour. Now from the point of view of somone standing alongside the tracks, how fast the ball is moving? All U have to do is add the speed of train 50KM and the speed of ball 20KM that is 70KM/hour.
Everything so far makes sense. let me move on to speed of light now. It has already been proved beyond doubts that speed of light is independent of motion. In other words, light always travel at the same speed i.e. 186000 miles/second. It does not matter, if the source of light or the observer or both are moving. So the speed of light is always constant under all circumstances. So imagine again you are no a moving train moving much faster at the half speed of train 93000 miles/second and instead of throwing a ball u turn on a flash light. How fast the light is travelling relative to the observar standing alongside the tracks? In this case, relative to the observar light is travelling or moving at the speed of 186000 miles/second. Seems non-commonsensical, doesn't it? But this has proven to be true through many experiments over the years. :happy: Now one final twist. This one's like the previous one, but with a twist. Again, you're on a train moving at 93,000 mps, and again, you turn on your flashlight. How fast does the light travel relative to you? Ans is same 186000 miles/second. Relative to the man on the train, the light is moving ahead at 186,000 mps, just as it is for the observer outside the train. The speed of light remains constant for all observers.
By now you probably understand the conflict: How is it possible that light always travels at the same speed, no matter how fast its source is moving? Are you familiar with the equation v=d/t? All it says is velocity (speed) equals distance travelled divided by time.
See the relationship between speed, distance and time?
If we use this equation in our first scenario—the one where you threw the ball—it works out fine. For you, within the train, as well as for someone standing by the tracks, we can calculate the speed of the ball by adding the distance the train travelled and the distance the ball travelled.
The equation does not work out so well in the second scenario, though, because we're dealing with the speed of light, so the "v" in the equation always has to be 186,000 miles per second.
So what can be concluded? That time (and maybe even distance as well) is not the same for all observers.
Time Can vary. That's right! Contrary to what common sense tells us, time and distance are not fixed. This, too, is the assumption Einstein made. In our second and third train examples, the speed of light turns out to be exactly the same for both you and the observer standing along the tracks because time, as measured by your watch, ticked along at a slower pace than time measured by the observer. Not only that, distance changed, too. For the observer, a one-foot ruler whizzing by on the train would have measured less than a foot.
The weird thing is that, for you on the train, time wouldn't seem to be moving slower and your ruler wouldn't be shorter—all would appear normal. However, time on the rest of the Earth would appear to be ticking along slower and its rulers would be shorter.
Now let's say you want to do some time travelling. You board a spaceship and take off for deep space.
The ship approaches the speed of light. Time for you seems to pass as it always has. It takes you about five seconds to tie your shoe. But to an observer on Earth (assuming he or she could watch you), you are moving at a snail's pace. It takes hours to tie your shoe.
Anyway, you continue on your journey. You slow down, stop, and accelerate back to Earth. You arrive home. You have aged two years during your flight. Two hundred years have passed on Earth. You have successfully travelled forward through time.
Now you want to go back? Sorry. According to relativity, you can only move through time in one direction.
4315
« on: January 24, 2010, 03:07:19 AM »
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: hahhaha real bolndeeeeeeeeeeeee :hehe: :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:
bibi tanu ma hun blonde kena shad dita
4316
« on: January 24, 2010, 03:04:38 AM »
intersting facts if we realy care abt them
massive amount of money is spent
A Life is costlier then any amount of money. This is as simple as that. They value the lives of their citizens.
4317
« on: January 24, 2010, 02:56:27 AM »
apan veere jama sahi gall karde aa :laugh: :laugh:
apna ta ik principle haga apna koi pbi veer galt gal b bole ta teek hagi. :happy:
4318
« on: January 24, 2010, 02:33:06 AM »
lai das
bhave ehne di chori v nah hoi hove :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:
gall murders di hagi chori di ni :lost:
4319
« on: January 24, 2010, 02:31:23 AM »
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
honest ans dekh lya c asin v :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
tusi boli jai joth, krna tusi b eho haga :happy:
4320
« on: January 24, 2010, 02:29:07 AM »
three idiot vekh um shuru u gt d solution :balle: :balle:
dekhn di ki lor hagi tu kehndi teri akha vicho bijli digdi aa
|
Show Posts
