tu 22 5 ghante aya kar ava akha krab kare gya :laugh: :laugh:

i know yanky she kamjor hogye

pata nhi kyu ban karta he my friend je nhi jakeen aunda gal karva phone te

ajj fir karye

 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

je ada kida ho sakhda  chalo chado koi ik topic c

New Delhi August 12:
In a rare judgment that may have far-reaching consequences, Delhi High Court on Wednesday came to the rescue of two minors who had got married against their parents' wishes, ruling that their wedding was "valid".
The court ruled that though the marriage flouted one of clauses in section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act - which lays down the minimum age of marriage as 18 years for the bride and 21 for the groom - this in itself did not make the marriage void. A division bench comprising Justices B D Ahmed and V K Jain said the clause which laid down the minimum age (clause III, section 5), wasn't one of the conditions stipulated in the Hindu Marriage Act that would render a marriage void.
"A Hindu marriage solemnized in contravention of clause III, section 5 of the HMA... does not fall in the category of voidable marriages," the bench ruled. The court said that even under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, the marriage involving minors had not been declared as invalid. The Act just says that the marriage can be annulled on this ground if a plea is made by the minor partner.
"It is clear that where, earlier, a child marriage may not have been voidable under personal law, as in the case of the Hindu Marriage Act, by virtue of the section 3 of the Prohibition of Child marriage Act, it has explicitly been made voidable at the option of the child spouse. But nobody other than a party to the marriage can petition for its annulment," the court said. It said the legislature while drafting the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act had consciously left out marriages in contravention of the age stipulation from the category of void or invalid marriages.
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Sharma, who is not yet 18 years old, had sought the court's intervention after a criminal case was registered against him on the complaint of his 16-year-old wife's family. They alleged that the boy had abducted her. The court ordered quashing of the FIR, which had booked the boy for kidnapping and rape, stating that "Poonam (the bride) has clearly stated that she left her home on her own and of her own free will...continuing proceedings pursuant to them would be an exercise in futility and would not be in the interest of justice".
The court added that even the offence under Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, which provides for the punishment of a male adult above 18 years of age, was not made out as " Jitender is less than 18 years of age". "We direct that Poonam is no longer required to be kept at Nirmal Chhaya. She is free to go with her husband and reside with him in his home. Jitender's father, brother and sister have assured this court that they will provide full support to the young couple," said the court.

Chandigarh August 12:
            After 13 years of trying to undo a “mistake”, the Punjab government has finally started the process of de-notifying over 55,000 hectares of land locked under the Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA) across five districts of Punjab.
The first set of notifications delisting the pockets under the PLPA in Karoran, Nadah and Perchh villages in SAS Nagar district were issued by the Forest Department today.
Interestingly, the department has started the delisting process from Chandigarh’s peripheral villages where most of the land under the PLPA is owned by VIPs, including politicians, bureaucrats and police officers. Sources add that the VIP lobby and the land mafia had been pressurising the government to undertake the de-listing of the forest land in Chandigarh’s periphery first and only after that take up the delisting of other areas.
Thousands of farmers in Ropar, Hoshiarpur and Gurdaspur who are unable to till their land due to it being locked under the PLPA are, however, still awaiting relief. Their turn, sources add, is likely to come within the next three years as the process of de-notifying was cumbersome and involved preparation of detailed khasra number lists. The source added that the de-listing of the PLPA is specific to certain pockets only in certain villages and it should not be thought that all land under the PLPA in Punjab has been denotified.
Most of this land falls in the eco-fragile zone and is notified under Sections IV and V of the PLPA 1900. The PLPA does not allow a host of activities, including construction. The move to denotify this land from the PLPA was initiated in 1997 when it was discovered that vast tracts of land under habitation and cultivation had been “wrongly” shown as forest land. The land was ordered to be delisted from the list of forest areas under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, by the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests in July last year.
The ministry has, however, laid down strict conditions on the delisting of land from the PLPA banning any form of commercial activity on this land. The land is to be used only for bonafide agricultural purposes and related activities to sustain the livelihood of the landowner. In September last year, a committee constituted by the department had recommended that the land be denotified from the PLPA and its control handed over to the Revenue Department. The government accepted the recommendations of the committee and it was decided that the de-notified areas be placed under the jurisdiction of the state authority that managed the land.
For instance, for Nadah and Karoran villages, which along with Kansal village form part of the Nayagaon notified area committee (NAC), the NAC will manage the de-notified land. “It will now be the duty of the Nayagaon NAC to ensure the implementation of the conditions laid down by the government of India for these pockets. In case they allow any activity other than agriculture on these chunks, they will be facing the ire of the steering committee of the Supreme Court,” pointed out a Forest Department official.

Chandigarh August 12:
            Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal wants vendetta politics to end not only in Punjab but also in the whole of the country.
“I do not believe in vendetta politics. It is not good,” he said in an media. Badal maintains that the case against his immediate predecessor, Capt Amarinder Singh, was not registered by the present regime but was initiated during the previous Congress rule in the state.
He maintained that no case against any Congress leader or MLA had been registered during the SAD-BJP government though the previous Congress government not only implicated former Akali Ministers in false cases but also treated them shabbily. ”It was Congress that started vendetta politics. I would not have felt that bad if they had implicated my son or me. They implicated my wife also. What had my wife to do with all these?” he quipped.
Talking about elevation of Sukhbir Singh Badal, he said that it was for the Shiromani Akali Dal to decide. “I had no hand in his becoming Deputy Chief Minister,” he said maintaining that politics was no exception, as wards of doctors become doctors; engineers become engineers and so on. He said that his continuation as Chief Minister was also dependent upon the party. Referring to the Rajiv-Longowal accord, Punjab Chief Minister said that he forewarned Sant Harchand Singh Longowal that he might be cheated into the accord. “I was proved right as the transfer of Chandigarh to Punjab was cancelled at the last moment,” he said.

[/size]