Ryan:

Wassup sayang?

Kisse ne ban ni keeeta hona. apni purani ip tau login karda hona ohnu ban lageya.

Teeje ke din daura peh janda ehnu.

OH sorry menu galat reply karta...mai samjeya sirf muhavre dasna.

LoL...gana kharab karta.

kaash sanu vi koi msg karda baar baar, te asi ode msg parhke vi kahiye, "sanu ta mile ni ji" lol

Jinni bheri teri shakal ohni teri gall.

Je koyee apne husband naal gall ni kar sakda, then relationship wich koyee problem haigi. Your husband is supposed to be your best friend. Teesre bande nu ki pata tuhade ghar di problems nu solve karan baray?

Kuri layee apne friends naal apne husband  tau ziyada galla sanjiya karniya kidda saukhiya ho sakdiya?

This story looks so not like a news story. I've never seen such sensationalism. Nobody would even take it seriously. It's setup as if it's a modeling portfolio for the ex employee. Who takes pics like that for a news story about such a serious topic?

Anyway, the truth will come out eventually I guess. Makes citibank look like a buncha goofs and makes her look like she's out for her 15 minutes of fame.

Dangar - janwara nu kehnde...kaday kaday mundeya nu vi keh dinde. lol

NEW YORK: A former Citibank employee has filed a lawsuit against her employers for allegedly firing her because her male colleagues found her "too distracting".

Debrahlee Lorenzana, 33, who worked in a New York branch of the bank, also claimed she was not allowed to wear certain clothes because it was "too distracting" for her bosses and co-workers.

"My entire life, I have been dealing with this. I couldn't take it anymore!" Lorenzana told the Village Voice, which did a cover story on her.

"I couldn't believe what I was hearing. I said, 'You gotta be kidding me!' I was like, 'Too distracting? For who? For you? My clients don't seem to have any problem."

So, Lorenzana was asked to stop wearing things like pencil skirts turtlenecks, 3-inch heels or fitted business suits.

"If it wasn't my shirt, it was my pants. If it wasn't my pants, it was my shoes. They picked on me every single day," she said.

Lorenzana, who is also a mother, stated that her female colleagues were allowed to wear the clothing she was told not to because of her "body type".

She even described some of her female co-workers dressing far more provocatively than herself.

Lorenzana filed a lawsuit against Citigroup for the unlawful termination. Citibank has issued a statement regarding the allegation levied against it.

"Lorenzana has chosen to make numerous unfounded accusations and inaccurate statements against Citibank and several of our employees," the bank said.

"While we will not discuss the details of her case, we can say that her termination was solely performance-based and not at all related to her appearance or attire. We are confident that when all of the facts and documentation are presented, the claim will be dismissed," it added.

The media here have been fascinated by Lorenzana's story and her potential lawsuit on sexual harassment and wrongful termination.

The Village Voice described her as having "JLo curves meets Jessica Simpson rack meets Audrey Hepburn elegance."

ABC news, however, reported that it is unlikely that Lorenzana will get her day in court because of something called the "mandatory arbitration clause", which means that in her contract she agreed that any dispute will be settled through arbitration.

But Lorenzana's lawyer, Jack Tuckner, said he and his client would have preferred a jury trial.

"A jury will act [more] with their heart and their emotions than an arbitrator ever will," he told ABC. "You're far less likely to ever see a penny of punitive (damages) with an arbitrator."

LoL.. Peg tau bina himmat ni aundi viah layee? lol