The judging criteria is posted.

Why not posting all the scores?
Most people don't want to see that some judges rated their shoes as "terrible" or gave a score of 1, etc. The point is to look for a winner that has high scores in all the criteria and no bias of having favorites/friends, so we use average votes from 4 judges. I personally don't want to hurt anybody's feelings, so I'm keeping the scores private. No judge knows what another judge voted. Nobody except I (sorry for that) knows what each person's score is.

Possible flaw
It could be argued that I'm an evil person that may be cheating (I did win the last competition). I will honestly take that criticism, and think that we should appoint 1 more person (picked by the janta) that can double check my math. It could be my enemy, it could be anybody.

Another solution: Participants share their score
I did say that I can share what each participant's score is to them alone. So if the participants feel confident/OK/etc, they can share the scores with all here. And then we can all see who received what in each criteria. Here I'll do the honors:

I feel confident by my scores, so here they are totals:

Totals   Judge 1   Judge 2   Judge 3   Judge 4   
Grenade Singh   28   26   23   24   101

Individual judge scores based on criteria:

User/Criteria   Jutti di fitting [1-5]   Jutti is on feet [1-5]   Complements Feet [1-5]   Color & Style [1-5]   Punjabi Virsa [1-5]   Variety [1-5]   Total (out of 30)

Judge 1
Grenade Singh   5   5   5   4   5   4   28

Judge 2
Grenade Singh   4   4   4   5   5   4   26

Judge 3
Grenade Singh   4   4   4   4   4   3   23

Judge 4
Grenade Singh   4   5   4   3   4   4   24